Disclosure: This content may contain affiliate links. Read my disclosure policy.
The Times Union recently published one of the best articles I’ve read in a long time about the future of hiking in the Catskills High Peaks.
Rather than rehashing the entire piece, I wanted to highlight the few points that surprised me most and explain why I think they matter to anyone who spends time in these mountains.
Technology has changed hiking more than even I am sometimes willing to admit
The biggest surprise for me wasn’t the bird research. It was learning just how closely the DEC now works with AllTrails and Strava.
The agency has been partnering with both companies for years, asking them to remove unofficial routes and correct inaccurate trail information. AllTrails’ Public Lands Program even allows land managers to edit trail information directly and post alerts to hikers. That’s really great progress.
For decades, reaching many of the trailless Catskill High Peaks required traditional navigation skills. You needed a map, compass, guidebook, local knowledge, or all four. Today, hikers can simply open an app and follow a GPS track to a summit they may never have attempted twenty years ago.
I’m comfortable navigating with map and compass, and I still think everyone who hikes regularly should learn those skills because they’re useful, enjoyable, and make you a more confident backcountry traveler. Even so, most of the time, I navigate with my iPhone. Smartphone navigation has become the norm for all of us.
It’s difficult to overstate how much those apps have changed visitation patterns across New York’s wilderness.
Science is measuring what we all suspected
The article also highlights the work of Dr. Kara Belinsky and her students at SUNY New Paltz, who spent three years studying birds across fourteen Catskill High Peaks.
Rather than arguing from emotion or assumption, Belinsky’s team actually measured how official trails, herd paths, and undisturbed forest affect montane bird species such as the Bicknell’s thrush, magnolia warbler, and winter wren.
Good management depends on good science. It’s really encouraging to see that quality of work happening right here in the Catskills.
Ugh, good science takes time
I’ve long believed the case for creating official trails to many of the Catskills’ trailless High Peaks was compelling. As visitation has exploded, we’ve all watched single herd paths become multiple herd paths, with hikers fanning out across increasingly fragile terrain. I’ve watched the summit of Rocky Mountain — one of the most remote mountains in the Catskills — become degraded beyond recognition. It has seemed obvious that concentrating that use onto thoughtfully designed routes would better protect the mountains.
But “it seems obvious” isn’t actually good enough.
We live in an age of instant opinions and instant solutions, where waiting for evidence feels frustrating. Yet this is exactly why careful scientific research matters. It tests our intuitions. Sometimes it confirms what we thought we knew. Other times it completely overturns our assumptions. History is full of management decisions that seemed obvious at the time but turned out to be harmful. Either outcome is valuable because it replaces confidence with knowledge.
So I really appreciate Kara Belinsky’s work. Rather than relying on anecdotes or assumptions, she and her students spent years collecting data across the High Peaks. Research like that is painstaking, expensive, and slow, but it gives land managers something much firmer than instinct to build policy on. (This kind of data will also be invaluable when making the case for future state funding.)
In this case, the evidence strengthens what many of us suspected: allowing an ever-expanding web of herd paths to spread across sensitive high-elevation habitat isn’t a sustainable long-term strategy. Thoughtfully planned official trails won’t eliminate our impact, but they can help concentrate it in places where it can be better managed.
BTW, you might also enjoy…
Hiking isn’t causing bird declines, but our foot traffic still really matters
This is probably the most important point in the entire article.
Belinsky is careful to explain that hiking is not the reason these bird populations are declining. The biggest pressures come from habitat loss elsewhere in their range, especially in Central and South America where many of these species spend the winter. Window strikes and domestic cats also kill enormous numbers of birds every year.
But the Catskills are where many of these birds breed and raise their young.
That makes our behavior here disproportionately important. Disturbing nesting birds during late spring and early summer may not be the primary cause of population decline, but it’s one of the few pressures we can actually reduce.
The advice I took away is very straightforward:
- Stay on official trails during breeding season, especially from late May through mid-July
- Keep dogs leashed above 3,000 feet
These two simple steps allow hikers to enjoy these mountains while giving some of their rarest residents a better chance to succeed.
Read the original article
I’ve only touched on the points that struck me most. The original Times Union story goes into much greater depth about the research, the proposed Visitor Use Management Plan, and the DEC’s evolving approach to managing recreation in the High Peaks.
If you care about the future of hiking in the Catskills, I think it’s well worth your time. It’s one of the most thoughtful pieces I’ve read on the subject in years.
Mountain-Hiking.com is independently owned and supported by readers and a small group of sponsors. If you’d like to help me continue producing content like this, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter.
More
Get full access…
Get instant access to the full version of this site and enjoy great supporter benefits: full galleries, full trail notes, early access to the latest content, and more.
Hot on the website right now…
Follow for more…
Follow my @TotalCatskills content on Instagram for regular hiking inspo and safe, inclusive community.


